More Violin Mislabelling
#1
Posted 16 July 2012 - 06:02 PM
http://www.bristowvi...arte/4538239041
This is not John's work....!!!
In my opinion the mentioned label has no place in this instrument.
#2
Posted 16 July 2012 - 06:26 PM
Specializing in the research and restoration
of baroque, transitional, and modern violins.
http://www.violinist..._johann_taylor/
(violin shop ad, with links to instruments for sale, pictures of
violins I restored, and recordings and pics of my clavichords)
#3
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:00 PM
Jeffrey
J. S. Holmes Fine Violins, LLC
Oberlin Summer Restoration Workshops
Oberlin Summer Instrument Restoration Workshop on Facebook
#4
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:18 PM
I guess that it’s time for me to stop being a Maestronet lurker and emerge from under my rock…
Two points to add to Melvin’s post:
1. In early March 2012 the violin featured was advertised as being “by John B. Harte, Rutland Street, New Zealand“. Following contact with Daniel Bristow, the wording was changed to what now appears. The fact that I did not make this violin is not being contested.
2. In spite of my requests, Daniel Bristow has said that he will not remove the label, has not removed my name from his website and has not supplied me with the name of who sold him the violin. He has not replied to my last email where I repeated these requests.
I believe that it is important the label be removed from the violin at this stage as it will only be a matter of time before it reappears somewhere else as having been made by me.
Unfortunately for many of us, our labels will likely be the only means of identifying our work in the future. Beyond my lifetime, identifying this case of mislabelling on a factual basis will disappear, leaving opinion to rule the day.
I cannot understand the reluctance to remove this label. It seems nonsensical.
I look forward to your comments.
John Harte
#5
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:24 PM
BTW; there may be laws copyright laws that are being broken in this case. Wish I was a lawyer... I'm not... but if I were in this situation, I might call mine.
Jeffrey
J. S. Holmes Fine Violins, LLC
Oberlin Summer Restoration Workshops
Oberlin Summer Instrument Restoration Workshop on Facebook
#6
Posted 16 July 2012 - 08:01 PM
Thank you for your comments.
I will send on this thread as you suggest!
The legal issues involved do interest me. My best guess is that there may be no international standard and that, in this particular case, being familiar with the specifics of English law would be necessary.
I am curious as to how widespread this form of mislabelling is.
John
#7
Posted 16 July 2012 - 08:11 PM
#8
Posted 17 July 2012 - 01:09 AM
http://www.maestrone...howtopic=325482
http://www.maestrone...howtopic=325472
#9
Posted 17 July 2012 - 01:34 AM
Specializing in the research and restoration
of baroque, transitional, and modern violins.
http://www.violinist..._johann_taylor/
(violin shop ad, with links to instruments for sale, pictures of
violins I restored, and recordings and pics of my clavichords)
#10
Posted 17 July 2012 - 01:37 AM
Since in the eyes of the law you are the undisputed authority on your own work, that actually puts you in a somewhat advantageous position compared to a consumer. If you don't actively enforce your own trademark/copyright through appropriate legal avenues, you can't rely or expect anyone else to enforce it (such as having them remove the label). If you haven't already done so, the first steps with all such matters is consult a competent attorney and report this to the appropriate authorities. This will legally establish that you have at least attempted to defend your intellectual property and allow you to pursue further legal action, including but not limited to seizure.Melvin thank you for posting this.
I guess that it’s time for me to stop being a Maestronet lurker and emerge from under my rock…
Two points to add to Melvin’s post:
1. In early March 2012 the violin featured was advertised as being “by John B. Harte, Rutland Street, New Zealand“. Following contact with Daniel Bristow, the wording was changed to what now appears. The fact that I did not make this violin is not being contested.
2. In spite of my requests, Daniel Bristow has said that he will not remove the label, has not removed my name from his website and has not supplied me with the name of who sold him the violin. He has not replied to my last email where I repeated these requests.
I believe that it is important the label be removed from the violin at this stage as it will only be a matter of time before it reappears somewhere else as having been made by me.
Unfortunately for many of us, our labels will likely be the only means of identifying our work in the future. Beyond my lifetime, identifying this case of mislabelling on a factual basis will disappear, leaving opinion to rule the day.
I cannot understand the reluctance to remove this label. It seems nonsensical.
I look forward to your comments.
John Harte
This is as good a place to start as any. There is even live chat available on the site.
http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/fraud_protection/counterfeit_goods
Edited by Flyboy, 17 July 2012 - 06:29 AM.
#11
Posted 17 July 2012 - 05:23 AM
Widespread enough. I would want the label removed too.I am curious as to how widespread this form of mislabelling is.
John
A dealer in China contacted me about the violin below, which was offered to him for sale. If a dealer doesn't know a living maker's work, contacting the maker is basic "due diligence" as far as I'm concerned, and not that difficult to do. I wonder why musicians would want to do business with a dealer who hasn't taken some basic steps to ensure the authenticity of what they sell, and isn't willing to "eat it" when they make a mistake?
I suppose this fiddle is still running around somewhere. Maybe I should check the Bristow Violins website for it from time to time?
Before you criticize a man you should walk a mile in his shoes.
That way when you criticize him you will be a mile away and you will have his
shoes.
Burgess Instruments
Oberlin Restoration Workshops
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you'll have to catch up.
#12
Posted 17 July 2012 - 06:16 AM
finally david i suggest you convince the chinese burgess that you really are hulk hogan and youve booked a flight to china to "settle the score" not to mention spend time with their animals, thatll make them think twice before they slap a burgess label in their cheap violin
Specializing in the research and restoration
of baroque, transitional, and modern violins.
http://www.violinist..._johann_taylor/
(violin shop ad, with links to instruments for sale, pictures of
violins I restored, and recordings and pics of my clavichords)
#13
Posted 17 July 2012 - 09:16 AM
This is indeed a crime that happens far too often for some of these hard working makers...
-L.L
#14
Posted 17 July 2012 - 09:49 AM
... and immediately be slapped with a copyright infringement lawsuit, as "David Burgess" was likely copyrighted by the Chinese maker there.finally david i suggest you convince the chinese burgess that you really are hulk hogan and youve booked a flight to china to "settle the score"
#15
Posted 17 July 2012 - 10:56 AM
you might set up a dummy ebay account, buy the violin, never pay for it, and leave horrible feedback, much cheaper than taking him to court
The seller should have little problem getting that feedback removed.
On the positive side, what a surreal feeling to have your work spoofed. It says that you matter.
#16
Posted 17 July 2012 - 06:03 PM
The seller should have little problem getting that feedback removed.
On the positive side, what a surreal feeling to have your work spoofed. It says that you matter.
I think the bad feedback will last for 6 months to a year and can not be removed, it happened to a friend of mine , he talked to ebay they said tough luck.
foolin with fiddles
#17
Posted 17 July 2012 - 06:40 PM
You might be right on that. According to eBay, it's a legal issue even if it's totally undeserved. The only way they can take feedback off is if profanity is used.I think the bad feedback will last for 6 months to a year and can not be removed, it happened to a friend of mine , he talked to ebay they said tough luck.
#18
Posted 17 July 2012 - 06:46 PM
You make a number of interesting points.
Jacob, thank you for listing the threads.
It’s a shame that your father’s name has been caught up in this.
He was a very nice person who willingly gave. I met him at the VSA Competition in 1994 where he was one of the judges.
I have started working my way through these threads but have some way to go. What I have read so far is disturbing...
David, I much appreciate your comments and agree whole heartedly regarding "due diligence".
As you say, this is not that difficult to do.
In my case, had the shop owner looked in any reasonably recent Strad Directory, alarm bells should have rung. In fact, the address, including the format provided on the label, should have been enough to cause concern.
On a different topic, is there a guide as to how to include multiple quotes of previous postings within a single new post?
I'm totally new to this....
John
#19
Posted 17 July 2012 - 06:59 PM
On a different topic, is there a guide as to how to include multiple quotes of previous postings within a single new post?
I'm totally new to this....
Yes, it's a bit laborious. Open a second instance/window with your browser, go to the post you wish to reply to, click on "reply," and manually copy what shows up in the text edit box & paste it to the edit box of the first window.
Since you're still learning your way around the forum UI, for the time being I recommend that you just quote from single posts until you get the hang of it.
#20
Posted 17 July 2012 - 07:30 PM
A simpler way is to hit "multiquote" on the bottom of each post you want to respond to, and then hit "reply" at the very bottom of the page. All the quotes will show up.Yes, it's a bit laborious. Open a second instance/window with your browser, go to the post you wish to reply to, click on "reply," and manually copy what shows up in the text edit box & paste it to the edit box of the first window.
Since you're still learning your way around the forum UI, for the time being I recommend that you just quote from single posts until you get the hang of it.
John, I empathize with your dilemma, so just let me know how I can help better.
Bristow Violins, this thread will probably show up early in a search under your name within a few days, so what would you like to do at this point?
Before you criticize a man you should walk a mile in his shoes.
That way when you criticize him you will be a mile away and you will have his
shoes.
Burgess Instruments
Oberlin Restoration Workshops
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you'll have to catch up.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










