Question: One piece top plate
#1
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:30 PM
#2
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:38 PM
Specializing in the research and restoration
of baroque, transitional, and modern violins.
http://www.violinist..._johann_taylor/
(violin shop ad, with links to instruments for sale, pictures of
violins I restored, and recordings and pics of my clavichords)
#3
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:39 PM
Once you notice your first one piece belly, you start too feel surounded by them. Some makers seem to normaly use one pc. bellies (Cypers, for instance). After all, if the wood is big enough, you would be daft to saw it in half, and join it again, wouldn`t you!In most cases, the articles or books, it is evident that the interpretation of the top plate of the violin in one piece, and implemented by school Mittenwald. Or is this method of construction (one piece above), was known elsewhere. I ask for your opinion, especially you Roger, Jacob, Lyndon, Peter and others. I ask for your input especially from your experience on this issue.
#4
Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:25 PM
my guess is one piece tops can be found just about anywhere trees grow 2ft wide or wider
Lyndon, Thanks for your reply.
How I understood the answer, one piece tops are not tied to a specific region.
Can you tell me if this can be characteristic of large or well-known builder in the 18th or 19th century (Italy, Germany, Czech Republic or elsewhere).
#5
Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:35 PM
Lyndon, Thanks for your reply.
How I understood the answer, one piece tops are not tied to a specific region.
Can you tell me if this can be characteristic of large or well-known builder in the 18th or 19th century (Italy, Germany, Czech Republic or elsewhere).
Thanks Jacob,
I am uncertain of one piece, because one piece on top of the violin most of the people immediately "characterized" as an inexpensive instrument made in Mittenwald - (Northern Alps). For this reason also I would like some more information about my imperfect knowledge.
#6
Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:47 PM
It would be mistaken to “characterize” it as coming from anywhere particular. I will leave it to Roger to say which one pc. Italians he has seen. I have a Mirecourt one here in the workshop at the moment and probably other ones, where I haven`t noticed yet.Thanks Jacob,
I am uncertain of one piece, because one piece on top of the violin most of the people immediately "characterized" as an inexpensive instrument made in Mittenwald - (Northern Alps). For this reason also I would like some more information about my imperfect knowledge.
#7
Posted 12 June 2012 - 04:13 PM
#8
Posted 12 June 2012 - 05:22 PM
Ottawa, Canada
http://guyharrison.com
#9
Posted 12 June 2012 - 09:53 PM
yes, quite a lot of Mirecourt violins, even late 19h century ones...
I see quite a few inexpensive Mirecourt violins with one-piece tops, too.
#10
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:50 PM
In most cases, the articles or books, it is evident that the interpretation of the top plate of the violin in one piece, and implemented by school Mittenwald. Or is this method of construction (one piece above), was known elsewhere. I ask for your opinion, especially you Roger, Jacob, Lyndon, Peter and others. I ask for your input especially from your experience on this issue.
I guess I'm one of the "others".
No. It is not exclusive to Mittenwald. Some Cremonese makers, including Stradivari, occasionally made instruments with one piece tops (I believe the "Conte de Fontana" is one). Guadagnini used them, a number of French makers were known to use one piece tops (including Vuillaume), Cuypers has already been mentioned (I have one here with a one piece top), I've seen a few American instruments with one piece tops, etc., etc.
Jeffrey
J. S. Holmes Fine Violins, LLC
Oberlin Summer Restoration Workshops
Oberlin Summer Instrument Restoration Workshop on Facebook
#11
Posted 12 June 2012 - 10:56 PM
I had a slab for a 1-piece top. Had to saw it in half to fit it into my processing chamber.After all, if the wood is big enough, you would be daft to saw it in half, and join it again, wouldn`t you!
Yes, I agree... I'm daft. And quite comfortable with that.
At least I didn't have to worry about different runout across the joint.
#12
Posted 13 June 2012 - 12:16 AM
"It is the mark of an instructed mind to rest satisfied with the degree of precision which the nature of the subject admits, and not to seek exactness when only an approximation of the truth is possible." - Aristotle
#13
Posted 13 June 2012 - 12:23 AM
Specializing in the research and restoration
of baroque, transitional, and modern violins.
http://www.violinist..._johann_taylor/
(violin shop ad, with links to instruments for sale, pictures of
violins I restored, and recordings and pics of my clavichords)
#14
Posted 13 June 2012 - 03:38 AM
I agree with your thesis and all involved in this topic.
However, pending a reply from Roger, gives some additional information.
If I can continue. I'm talking about one of the old violin that has some characteristics (including rates), the old Italian school. However, since the one-piece top plate, and probably replaced the violin neck, by almost everyone automatically places them in Mittenwald.
One-piece top plate has a lower and upper panels of wood pin.
Furthermore, the violin has a top and bottom block, and all four side blocks. Purfling channels are shallow, 1.0 - 1.1 mm, a width of 1.2 mm (measured from CT).
F holes are either Stradivari or Guarneri. F hole is above 42 mm, 121.7 mm below. Dimensions inside the violin (above 160.3 mm, 103.7 mm in the middle, below 201.6 mm), and are similar to mold "PG".
I have read here that the school Mittenwald include one-piece bottom rib, and a saddle that is partly cut in the rib.
Mentioned violin has a one piece bottom rib, ridge is extended to the lower rib. Under the saddle in the middle but not to fix a notch center.
I wonder whether this is another feature of these schools.
Or perhaps there are other features of the violins, which would more accurately be defined as a specific model.
#15
Posted 13 June 2012 - 04:09 AM
#16
Posted 13 June 2012 - 05:17 AM
How about some decent photographs? This could help explain everything real fast.Jacob,
I agree with your thesis and all involved in this topic.
However, pending a reply from Roger, gives some additional information.
If I can continue. I'm talking about one of the old violin that has some characteristics (including rates), the old Italian school. However, since the one-piece top plate, and probably replaced the violin neck, by almost everyone automatically places them in Mittenwald.
One-piece top plate has a lower and upper panels of wood pin.
Furthermore, the violin has a top and bottom block, and all four side blocks. Purfling channels are shallow, 1.0 - 1.1 mm, a width of 1.2 mm (measured from CT).
F holes are either Stradivari or Guarneri. F hole is above 42 mm, 121.7 mm below. Dimensions inside the violin (above 160.3 mm, 103.7 mm in the middle, below 201.6 mm), and are similar to mold "PG".
I have read here that the school Mittenwald include one-piece bottom rib, and a saddle that is partly cut in the rib.
Mentioned violin has a one piece bottom rib, ridge is extended to the lower rib. Under the saddle in the middle but not to fix a notch center.
I wonder whether this is another feature of these schools.
Or perhaps there are other features of the violins, which would more accurately be defined as a specific model.
Unfortunately many construction features you find on instruments are not exclusive to a specific school but can be found elsewhere. For example, the old Cremonese makers often have (or at least HAD) one piece lower and upper ribs, one piece tops are not uncommon, neck replaced (grafted), top and bottom block and all four side blocks (corner blocks), etc. etc.
Bruce
#17
Posted 13 June 2012 - 05:44 AM
How about some decent photographs? This could help explain everything real fast.
Unfortunately many construction features you find on instruments are not exclusive to a specific school but can be found elsewhere. For example, the old Cremonese makers often have (or at least HAD) one piece lower and upper ribs, one piece tops are not uncommon, neck replaced (grafted), top and bottom block and all four side blocks (corner blocks), etc. etc.
Bruce
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the response. I prepared and uploaded photos. I also have a CT scan.
#18
Posted 13 June 2012 - 06:47 AM
#19
Posted 13 June 2012 - 06:58 AM
Naturally.I also have a CT scan.
#20
Posted 13 June 2012 - 07:18 AM
Naturally.
For a die-hard Luddite such as myself, the CT scans are entirely useless window dressing. The (only) two pictures make it seem like it could be easy to identify as a Mittenwald “Verleger” if there were a few more pictures. Alternitively, I recently posted the comparative features of Mittenwald v. Markneukirchen/Schönbach
http://www.maestrone...68 (post # 18)
and should you be able to tick all boxes there, there would be little to argue or wonder about.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










